Last edited: July 18, 2004

Supreme Court Sodomy Decision Based on Junk Science

Traditional Values Coalition, August 22, 2003
TVC NEWS, Vol. 6, Issue 32

Summary: Dr. Judith Reisman, an expert on homosexuality and pornography has charged that the U.S. Supreme Court based its Texas sodomy ruling on junk science.

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning the sodomy laws in 14 states was based upon junk science, according to homosexuality and pornography expert Dr. Judith Reisman. Writing in the August 19, 2003 online edition of Human Events, she notes that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion was based upon “Öone sex ‘science’ resource as the Court’s primary authority on sex and sodomy-namely, the bi-homosexual, sadomasochistic, proven fraud, Prof. Alfred C. Kinsey.” Reisman notes that Kennedy also “genuflected” to statements about sodomy in the American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code of 1955. Yet these statements are also from Kinsey.

Dr. Reisman’s book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences documents Kinsey’s fraudulent research and his impact on the criminal justice system here in the U.S. and around the world.

Dr. Reisman says: “The Court needs to revisit this decision in the light of new facts displacing our ignorance: the knowledge that a duplicitous sexual deviant was the primary source used by the United States Supreme Court as their ‘science’ authority in Lawrence v. Texas.”

Dr. Reisman’s article is available here: HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE: The National Conservative Weekly Since 1944. []

For more on Dr. Reisman’s work, access her web site: Dr. Judith Reisman.[]

[Home] [News] [Wackos] [USA]