Zimbabwe Censorship Criticized
  NewsPlanet,
  Thursday, June 11, 1998
  SUMMARY: No government in southern Africa has its thumb on the media
  like that of Zimbabwe, and international anti-censorship activists note that the treatment
  of lesbians and gays is a prime example.
  
  The London-based anti-censorship group Article 19 issued a report this week saying that
  Zimbabwe leads southern Africa in government control of media, and particularly noting its
  use for uncontested verbal gay-bashing. Article 19 is named for the section on freedom of
  expression in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The group said the government had
  used mass media "to promote a climate of intolerance," noting that the
  government-controlled "Herald" newspaper ran advertisements urging the death
  penalty for sodomy convictions and seeking to "mobilize Zimbabweans against sexual
  perverts," but denied gays and lesbians the chance either to reply or to place their
  own ads on the grounds that it was "a family newspaper." 
  
  The government controls most of the press (and constantly practices legal harassment
  against the financially-struggling independent press, according to Article 19) and all of
  radio, television, and telecommunications (with some of the lowest per capita access and
  worst maintenance record in the world), including attempts to control Internet access. As
  public protest against the government has grown and intensified in recent months, the
  government has exerted more stringent controls on reporting, including reprimanding and
  firing broadcasters and replacing the "Herald" newspaper's editor with President
  Robert Mugabe's nephew (who died shortly afterwards), and even ordering the manner in
  which stories should be presented (although one government official flatly denied those
  charges). And Article 19 says that although the courts have staunchly defended the
  constitution, the government has had no qualms about responding to lost court cases by
  amending the constitution at will to suit its own ends. The upshot is that Zimbabweans
  have little unbiased information about goings-on in their own country. Article 19 fears
  there will be increasingly serious human rights violations. 
  
  Article 19 also welcomed some recent proposals from the Ministry of Justice for reform of
  media law and protections for freedom of expression, but called them first steps and said
  more was necessary. 
  
  [Home] [News] [Zimbabwe]