Virginia Court Strikes Down Singles Sex Law
The Associated Press,
January 14, 2005
By Larry O'Dell
RICHMOND, Va.—The Virginia
Supreme Court on Friday struck down an archaic and rarely enforced state law
prohibiting sex between unmarried people.
The unanimous ruling strongly suggests that a separate
anti-sodomy law in Virginia also is unconstitutional, although that statute is
not directly affected. The justices based their ruling on a U.S. Supreme Court
decision voiding an anti-sodomy law in Texas.
“This case directly affects only the fornication law
but makes it absolutely clear how the court would rule were the sodomy law
before it,” said Kent Willis, executive director of the American Civil
Liberties Union in Virginia.
Virginia’s anti-sodomy law prohibits oral and anal sex
even for married couples, but gay-rights advocates say the statute is only
used to target homosexuals. Legislators for years have rejected efforts to
repeal the law. They left it on the books again last year even after the Texas
decision held that such laws are unconstitutional.
“It’s a strong message to legislators that they must
repeal Virginia’s sodomy law,” Willis said. “Now both the U.S. Supreme
Court and the Virginia Supreme Court have spoken on essentially the same
The court said that “decisions by married or unmarried
persons regarding their intimate physical relationship are elements of their
personal relationships that are entitled to due process protection.”
The ruling stemmed from a woman’s lawsuit seeking $5
million in damages from a man who infected her with herpes. She claims the man
did not inform her that he was infected before they had sex.
Richmond Circuit Judge Theodore J. Markow threw out the
lawsuit, ruling that the woman was not entitled to damages because she had
participated in an illegal act. The Supreme Court reinstated the lawsuit.
The law against fornication had been on the books since
the early 1800s but was last enforced against consenting adults in 1847,
according to Paul McCourt Curley, attorney for the defendant in the lawsuit.
Curley said he sees nothing wrong with having laws on the
books, even if they are unenforced, that say “these are the ideals and
morals of the state of Virginia.” He said the ruling sends a message that
virtually anything goes—even adultery—as long as sex is consensual.
However, the justices noted that their ruling “does not
affect the commonwealth’s police powers regarding regulation of public
fornication, prostitution, or other such crimes.”
[Home] [News] [Virginia]