Last edited: March 26, 2005

Court Considers Gay Adultery Case

The Advocate, April 23, 2003

The New Hampshire supreme court will soon review a Lebanon, N.H., family court case that raises the question of whether an extramarital affair between people of the same sex qualifies as adultery under the state’s divorce laws. Robin Mayer, a lesbian from Brownsville, Vt., has asked the high court to rule that only sexual intercourse between heterosexuals can constitute adultery—and not sexual relations between people of the same sex. That may seem an unusual position for an openly gay person to take, but Mayer says that the laws of New Hampshire are biased against gay people.

Mayer was named as the third party in the divorce proceedings of David and Sian Blanchflower of Hanover after David Blanchflower accused his wife of having an “adulterous” relationship with Mayer.

Mayer is trying to use what she sees as a defect in the law to her advantage: She seeks to extricate herself from a bitter divorce case on the grounds that New Hampshire’s antiquated divorce statute doesn’t allow a wife to be accused of committing adultery with another woman.

Adultery is one of a handful of “faults” for which a New Hampshire court can grant a divorce, in addition to the no-fault ground of irreconcilable differences. Any finding that one spouse was at fault in the breakup of the marriage can disadvantage that spouse in the division of marital assets.

Mayer appealed to the state supreme court after Lebanon family court justice John Peter Cyr ruled that the legal definition of adultery should encompass same-sex sexual relations. “The Lebanon family court is attempting to overturn several centuries of the accepted definition of adultery, which is heterosexual sexual intercourse,” wrote Mayer, who is representing herself in the appeal.

Other states have redefined adultery to include homosexual sex, such as Georgia and Florida. A New Jersey court said that adultery occurs when a spouse engages in a “personal, intimate sexual relationship with any other person, irrespective of the specific sexual acts performed, the marital status, or the gender of the third party.”

[Home] [News] [New Hampshire]